RESEARCHING BAD BEHAVIOR BY PEOPLE, IN PARTICULAR WOMEN, HAS YIELDED A CATALOG OF MENTAL ILLNESS, PSYCHOSIS AND NEUROSIS. 

DOES THIS METHODOLOGY OVER LOOK THE RECOGNITION OF EVIL? 

ARE BAD THINGS DONE BY BAD PEOPLE WHO ARE EVIL, WHO INTEND TO DO EVIL KNOWINGLY AND WILLFULLY?

MANY OF THOSE PERSONS WHO WREAK HAVOC AND CREATE PAIN, ANGUISH AND HARM ARE NOT ONLY EVIL BUT THEY ARE ALSO NOT OF SOUND MIND. 

ANYONE WHO DOES ANYTHING TO INFLICT PAIN ANGUISH AND HARM ON ANOTHER PERSON IS EVIL.

THERE IS NO OVERRIDING GREATER PURPOSE OR DUTY OR DOING A JOB.

EVIL IS NOT JUSTIFIED BY SELF INTEREST

 

I could have made Child Rearing easy

I KNOW THAT I COULD HAVE FIGURED OUT A ROUTINE WHERE THE CHILDREN WERE CARED FOR AND WE, THE PARENTS, HAD FREE TIME AND TIME TO DO WORK WE GOT PAID FOR SOMEWHERE.

MY WIFE KNEW HOW TO MAKE THINGS HARD BY INSISTING ON DOCTRINAIRE OVERRULING OF SENSIBLE PLANS. 

I STILL CANNOT GET OVER BEING A FAMILY MAN AND BEING THUS SUBJECTED TO THE CONTROL OF WOMEN WHO LIKED THINGS TO BE HARD FOR ME. THE ATROCITY OF MY MOTHER, WITH MY FATHER WORTH $3 MILLION, COLLECTING $475 PER MONTH FROM ME FOR SIXTEEN YEARS.

I STILL CANNOT GET OVER BEING A FAMILY MAN AND BEING THUS SUBJECTED TO THE CONTROL OF WOMEN WHO LIKED THINGS TO BE HARD FOR ME. 

THE ATROCITY OF MY MOTHER, WITH MY FATHER WORTH THREE MILLION DOLLARS, COLLECTING $475 PER MONTH FROM ME FROM 1984 TO 2000 WHILE I HAD TO SUPPORT A FAMILY OF THREE CHILDREN IS UNFATHOMABLE.

THE DEBT WAS BOGUS, I DID NOT GET A PENNY, MY EX-WIFE GOT MONEY "NOW" TO DO WHAT SHE FELT LIKE DOING AND I PAID "LATER" WITH $475 PER MONTH AS WELL. MOTHER COLLECTED INTEREST THERE WAS NO PRINCIPAL REPAYMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DESPITE MY ASSERTION THAT I WOULD PAY ONLY PRINCIPAL IN CASH UNDER THE TABLE AS IT WAS DEMANDED. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO COLLECT INTEREST IN THAT MANNER.

WHAT IS REALLY UNLAWFUL IN EVERY WAY WAS THE CREATION OF AN EXPLOITABLE MINORITY IN STEALTH.

I WAS NOT NOTIFIED IN ANY WAY BEFORE I AGREED TO SUPPORT A FAMILY AND GET MARRIED THAT MY WIFE WOULD IMMEDIATELY THREATEN A PREVIOUSLY UNKNOWN LEGAL ACTION AGAINST ME  IF I DID NOT DO EVERYTHING SHE WANTED ME TO DO AND TO PAY FOR IT.

ALL OF EVERYTHING THAT WAS OR WOULD BE MINE WAS SEIZED BY FAMILY WOMEN FROM 1962 UNTIL 2000. IT WAS REALLY HORRIBLE. I ATTENDED UNIVERSITY PENNILESS WITH MOTHER SEIZING MY BANK ACCOUNT OF GIFTS OF MONEY FROM RELATIVES FROM ALL OF MY LIFE UNTIL THEN. IN 1964 MOTHER SEIZED MY TRUST FUND FROM MY PATERNAL GRANDFATHER AND I LIVED IN A FREEZING TENEMENT AT 18 AND I ATE BALONEY SANDWICHES WITH MOTHER SCOOPING UP THE $10K TO $14 K WHICH I WAS GOING TO BUY A SMALL HOTEL WITH. I WAS A FULL TIME UNIVERSITY STUDENT. NEEDLESS  TO SAY, THAT LEFT ME UNPREPARED FINANCIALLY FOREVER AND EVER IT SEEMED TO ME.

THEN I FINALLY GOT A CHEAP BADLY LOCATED HOUSE TOGETHER WITH MOST OF MY JEWELRY BUSINESS SOLD BUT I HAD ENOUGH LEFT TO CONTINUE ON.

HEY, POLICE, ALL THE REDNECKS UP THE ROAD KNOW EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED AND COMMIT A CRIME EVERY DAY THEY CONTINUE TO PROTECT THE CRIME AND LEAVE THEIR DEFAMATION OF MYSELF THERE IN POLICE RECORDS AND IN PUBLIC RECORDS AND AVAILABLE AND SPREAD TO THIS DAY BY CRD AND RCMP FROM SOOKE TO VICTORIA AND EVEN (IN MY FILES! FROM FOI!) TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

AFTER THE FIRE I WAS VULNERABLE AND POWERLESS AND DEFAMED AND MY WIFE TOOK FULL ADVANTAGE OF THAT.

SO DID EVERYONE ELSE AFTER MY WIFE JOINED THE ARSONIST CLIQUE AND SHE DEFAMED ME TO THE VICIOUS POLICE.

POSTSCRIPT ON FACEBOOK:

I WAS BEING EXTORTED BY MY MOTHER, ALWAYS, AND MY EX-WIFE IN 1984.

I HAD NOTHING LEFT BUT TWO GOLD BARS, ENOUGH TO DO A CASTING RUN, AND MY STASH I HAD JUST GROWN FOR MYSELF FOR THE FIRST TIME.

MY BROTHER ANDREW SAID " SO YOU REALIZE WHAT IT IS COSTING YOU TO SMOKE THIS STUFF? 

"WHAT?" I SAID "I GREW THIS IN THE GREENHOUSE WINDOW IN THE DINING ROOM" ".IT COST ALMOST NOTHING TO GROW".

BUT, HE SAID " WHAT ABOUT WHAT YOU COULD SELL THIS FOR?''

THE FAMILY WOMEN SENT ANDREW OVER TO MY HOUSE TO MAKE MY STASH INTO DRUG MONEY. THEY WERE HUNGRY FOR DRUG MONEY, THEY NEEDED DRUG MONEY JUST FOR THE SWEET TASTE OF "UNDER THE TABLE MONEY", UNACCOUNTABLE FOR DRUG MONEY BY RISKING MY LIFE AND FREEDOM AND DESTROYING MY ART WRITING AND MUSIC TO GET THEMSELVES DRUG MONEY.

A BILLIONAIRE SPORTS FRANCHISE OWNER GAVE A MUCH YOUNGER WOMAN $75,000. TO LET HIM HAVE SEX WITH HER. IT WAS NOT ALLEGED THAT HE HURT OR DEMEANED HER AND THAT AGE DIFFERENCE IS TREATED AS HIS ATROCITY

A BILLIONAIRE SPORTS FRANCHISE  OWNER  GAVE A MUCH YOUNGER WOMAN $75,000. TO LET HIM HAVE SEX WITH HER. IT IS NOT ALLEGED THAT HE HURT OR DEMEANED HER  AND THAT AGE DIFFERENCE IS TREATED AS HIS ATROCITY.

WHAT I THINK IS A MUCH MORE NOTABLE AGE DIFFERENCE IS MY FIFTY FIVE TO SEVENTY YEARS OF AGE AND DISABLED SITUATION, 2001 ON, WHERE THERE ARE NUMEROUS THIRTY FIVE YEAR OLD WOMEN FROM THE ALF TOONE HOUSING CORPORATION ONTO ME BY TRESPASSING AND SENDING THE POLICE TO MY VICTORIA ROCKCLIFFE APARTMENTS AND OUT HERE TO OTTER POINT TO MY ART, MUSIC AND WRITING STUDIO AND HOMESTEAD.

I TOLD ALL OF THE DOCTORS AND THE POLICE AND MY MLA'S AND MY MP'S STARTING IN 2001 THAT THIS BEHAVIOR CAUSES DEBILITATING COLLAPSES AND TONIC IMMOBILITY AND VIRTUAL PARALYSIS WHICH CAN PERSIST FOR YEARS. THERE HAS NOT EVER BEEN A REPLY WHEN ONE WOULD EXPECT REMEDY AND ASSISTANCE AND PEACE.

BE CAREFUL WITH THIS, LYING HAD BEEN PROCLAIMED AS LEGITIMATE FEMALE WEAPON

I HAVE LITERALLY NEVER HAD DINNER MADE FOR ME SINCE I GOT MARRIED IN 1978.

SURE, I HAD DINNER MADE FOR ME BY MY LIVE IN GIRLFRIEND BEFORE WE GOT MARRIED AND I HAD A LOT OF BREAKFASTS MADE FOR ME TOO. 

Right after we got married, in 1979, my house was ripped off from me. I was supposed to have the house to rent from the British Columbia Development Corporation permanently. 

BURRVILLA WAS MY HOME BEFORE THE DESPERATION PURCHASE OF THE HOUSE AT OTTER POINT. CORRUPT GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS PRETENDED TO SELL IT TO A MR LANG WHERE I HAD PAID $175,/MONTH FOR YEARS AND MAINTAINED IT.THEY WERE GIVING THEIR FRIEND MY HOUSE WHICH THEY KNEW WAS GOING TO BE MOVED TO A GREAT LOCATION AND THEY WANTED ME TO NOT HAVE IT ANY MORE.

THE HOUSE WAS TURNED OVER TO LANG IN ITS ORIGINAL LOCATION WHERE I TOOK OVER THE HOUSE IN 1974 NEEDING WORK, I DID IT. 

I WAS SUPPOSED TO GET TO KEEP LIVING IN THE HOUSE PERMANENTLY.

THE ONE DOLLAR PHONY PURCHASE WAS USED TO EVICT ME.

LANG WAS UNABLE TO PROPERLY MAINTAIN THE HOUSE HE GOT RENT FREE AND HE GAVE IT UP BACK TO THE BCDC. 

I THINK THEY WRECKED MY LIFE THAT I HAD TOGETHER THEN AND I NEVER GOT MY LIFE BACK.

I KNOW THE HOUSE'S ATTIC IS HOME TO A LARGE BAT COLONY NOW BUT I DO NOT KNOW IF ANYONE LIVES IN THE HOUSE NOW IN DEAS ISLAND PARK ON HIGH GROUND ON CRESCENT ISLAND. WHAT A LOCATION FOR A WRITER, ARTIST AND MUSICIAN TO LIVE. 

 THE EVICTION WAS ACCOMPLISHED  BY A LAWYER WHO GOT A JUDGE TO RULE IN DEFIANCE OF  RESIDENTIAL TENANCY LAW AND THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN MYSELF AND THE BCDC.

I WAS HOMELESS SO I BOUGHT LOT A  AT OTTER POINT BUT I HAD TO LIVE THERE ALONE AND FINISH THE HOUSE. 

THE DAY MY WIFE MOVED IN THE PALFRY  MADMAN TORCHED THE HOUSE WHEN I LEFT AT 8 PM TO GET SOME USED RECYCLED GLASS DOORS FOR THE SUNDECK ENCLOSURE.

I DID NOT GET DINNER THAT NIGHT AND TWO YEARS LATER WHEN MY WIFE MOVED IN TO THE SECOND HOUSE HERE ON LOT A SHE REFUSED TO COOK, CLEAN OR FUCK. "GO" SHE SAID, "JUST GO".

I NEVER GOT A DINNER, THE PLACE WAS A PIGSTY WHERE I HAD TO DO LAUNDRY AND IS IT EVER HARD TO BE A FAMILY SUPPORTING MAN WITH GRUDGING SEX SPARSELY OFFERED *( WHEN SHE WANTS SOMETHING!)* AND NO DINNER MADE FOR ME NOT EVER. 

LITERALLY AND ACCURATELY, NO ONE EVER MADE DINNER FOR ME AT THIS HOUSE OR ON THIS ACREAGE WHICH I FIND TO BE ABSURD. MY SUPPORT WAS ALWAYS REQUIRED FOR WIFE OR FOR MY GIRLFRIEND. WHY DID I NOT EVER GET DINNER MADE FOR ME?

PUT THE BLAME RIGHT ON ME.

EVERY SINGLE THING WHICH HAPPENS IS  PRESENTED TO ME AS SOMETHING WHICH "YOU CHOSE" AS IF I CREATED EVERY NEGATIVE FACTOR WHICH I SAY I DID NOT CREATE AND WAS DAMAGED BY AND WHICH I BITTERLY RESENT.

IT IS PUT TO ME THAT EACH AND EVERY DISABILITY DISENFRANCHISEMENT OR DAMAGE TO MY PROPERTY YOU COULD FILL IT IN COULD SO SIMPLY AND EASILY BE REVERSED. OR BY IGNORING THE DISABILITY AND ITS CAUSATION AND TAKING A PILL OR TAKING UP WEIGHT LIFTING WHEN I DECLARE I CAN NOT CARRY 20 LBS. THAT WOULD MAKE IT LIKE IT NEVER HAPPENED AND IF YOU WOULD HAVE LIFTED WEIGHTS RIGHT AFTER THE ACCIDENT YOU WOULD BE SO STRONG THAT THE BACK INJURY WOULD NOT BOTHER YOU AT ALL. IT IS ALL YOUR OWN FAULT. HEE HEE.  THERE IS NO DOUBT BACK AND NECK INJURY BUT IT IS THE SHELLSHOCK'S SWAYBACK THAT CREATES BACK INJURY LIKE DISABILITY AND INABILITY TO LIFT OR CARRY A WEIGHT OVER 20 POUNDS.

VIRTUAL PARALYSIS, COLLAPSE IMMOBILITY AND TONIC IMMOBILITY ARE NOT ACTUALLY BACK INJURY.

I AM TOLD THAT I SHOULD SUBMIT TO AUTHORITY AND ALLOW THEM TO ROAM MY PROPERTY LOOKING FOR A VIOLATION OF SOME EXACTING OVER REGULATION. 

THE LAST TIME THIS HAPPENED IT COST $5000 TO MEET THEIR DEMANDS. MICROFICHE HAD FADED AND THEY MADE ME APPLY FOR A NEW PERMIT FOR THE TOWER AND PUT IN A NEW WEAKER ELECTRICAL POWER DUAL INPUT DESPITE THE EXISTING LINES HAVING BEEN PERMITTED AND INSTALLED BY A GOOD LICENSED HIGHLY EXPERIENCED ELECTRICIAN. IT COST $5000.  

I AM TOLD I COULD LEAVE MY PROPERTY ANYTIME AND GO LIVE IN A CONDOMINIUM IN VICTORIA. WHAT ABOUT MUSIC PRACTICE, MY MARIJUANA USE, MY CATS, AND THE REDNECKS FROM UP THE ROAD STRIP HOMES OF COPPER. IT IS TOO DAMNED VALUABLE OF A THING TO JUST LEAVE THERE IN THAT HOUSE.

WHAT ABOUT THE LIEN FOR $0 OF UNPAID CHILD SUPPORT WHICH MY EX-WIFE LODGED AGAINST MY HOUSE AND LAND AFTER SHE WAS PAID AND AGREED TO GO AWAY FOREVER TWICE. TWICE. SHE AND HER LAWYER TYLER LUCCIES REFUSED TO RECOGNIZE HER FIRST, EXACTLY AS DEMANDED DIVORCE SETTLEMENT.

THE LIEN WOULD MEAN THAT THE HOUSE I ENTIRELY PAID FOR SOLO, THAT MY EX-WIFE OVER BORROWED ON COSTING ME ANOTHER $300K, AND SHE WAS PAID FOR TWICE IN DIVORCE SETTLEMENTS, IF IT WAS SOLD WOULD BE SUBJECT TO A DEMAND FOR ABOUT $450K, HALF OF THE INCREASE IN MY PROPERTY'S VALUE. 

I COULD NOT LEAVE THE HOUSE, THE THIEVES UP THE ROAD, NOR RENT IT BECAUSE BETTY OR TRIXIE WOULD NO DOUBT FIND A WAY TO SEND HER POLICE HELPERS. HER CROOK LAWYER HAS POLICE ON A STRING, I THINK ALL CORRUPT LAWYERS HAVE POLICE WHO ARE HABITUALLY COERCED TO AID THEIR CLAIMS.

I AM TOLD THAT SOMEONE MAKES A FAKE 911 CALL OR TRESPASSES AND I "GET MY ASS KICKED AFTER I HAVE STARTED TROUBLE". REALLY, BY TRYING TO FIND OUT THE FIRST THING YOU WOULD HAVE TO KNOW TO REDRESS THE FALSEHOOD, OR TO KNOW WHO HAD  DAMAGED PROPERTY:

 WHO WAS IT THAT DID IT?

I HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO IDENTIFY ANYONE WHO BROKE THE LAW HERE AT MY HOUSE OR AT THE ROCKCLIFFE NOR AT THE POLICE STATION, NOR IN COURT.

THERE IS A UP TO 100 FOOT WIDE DITCH 17 FEET DEEP, WHICH DESTROYS MY PROPERTY. WHEN I SEE IT I THINK I BEGIN TO COLLAPSE AND THEN HAVE TONIC IMMOBILITY, COLLAPSE IMMOBILITY, SHELLSHOCK.

1979, THIS IS VERY MUCH WHAT THE MEADOW LOOKED LIKE WHEN I BOUGHT LOT A ON OTTER POINT ROAD.

THIS IS THE DITCH WHICH MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO GET AROUND MY ONLY FLAT, GENTLY SLOPING LAND. IT IS HARD TO SEE UNLESS YOU SEE IT IN PERSON, OR WALK-SCRAMBLE DOWN ITS HUNDREDS OF FEET OF:

MY ENFANT TERRIBLE, WHO THINKS THE TRUCKER CONVOY WAS THE RIGHT ACTION TO TAKE, SAYS HE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT:

The bus parked in the driveway, can be seen on the bank of the ditch, see it. Remember the bus is way down from the original ground, as pictured earlier. THE UPPER LINE WAS THE ORIGINAL GROUND LEVEL.

************************ 

Ditch in the foreground.

"YOU COULD EASILY FILL IN THE DITCH". HE SAYS. "THAT WOULD BE ILLEGAL'' I SAID. "I NEVER WORRY ABOUT THAT" HE SAID. I HAD FILED A WATER ACTION AND WROTE THAT I KNEW THIS WAS A NEW WATERCOURSE. WHAT ABOUT THE WILDLIFE THAT LIVES IN THE DITCH CREEK NOW. HOW WOULD THE CULVERT NECESSARY NOT PLUG UP AND THEN FLOOD MY HOUSE DOWN IN THE HOLE THE SAME REDNECKS DUG AND THEN COERCED MY WIFE'S CONTRACTOR TO BUILD MY NICE HOUSE I DESIGNED IN. 

THE NEXT TIME I AM TOLD "YOU CHOSE" THERE HAS TO BE SOME SORT OF MEANINGFUL UNDERSTANDING CREATED THAT THE BLATHERING JEERER WILL NOT FORGET AND GIVE ME THE "YOU CHOSE" TREATMENT AND TAUNT AGAIN.

THE MULTIPLICATION OF ALL OF THE ASPECTS OF DEFAMATION

THERE WOULD BE ABOUT ONE THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO WOULD HEAR TALES OF DEFAMATION WHEN THEY WERE TOLD EVERYWHERE NONSTOP.

THE GOLD STANDARD WOULD BE FOR A DISTRAUGHT FEMALE TO TELL EVERYONE ALL  ABOUT HER MAN AT THE POLICE STATION, THAT WOULD GET ABOUT 38 PAIRS OF EARS EVEN IN SOOKE BC.

I WONDER WHAT MY EX-WIFE SAID ABOUT ME AS SHE GOT WELFARE IN VICTORIA BC AND ABOUT 80 MORE PEOPLE COULD GET TO HEAR ABOUT ME AND HOW TERRIBLE I WAS?

I WONDER HOW MANY PEOPLE HEARD BAD THINGS ABOUT ME AS MY EX-WIFE APPEALED TO THE CRD TO LET HER HAVE A BAKERY IN MY SHOP BUILDING. THE HEAD MAN CAME OUT TO SEE ME AND CONFIRM SHE COULD NOT DO THAT.

I WAS FORTUNATE THAT THE SHOP BUILDING WAS NOT BEING USED FOR ANY VISIBLE PROHIBITED  PURPOSE.

WILLIAM HITCH'S LEGAL SECRETARY TOLD ME THAT MY EX-WIFE HAD GONE TO SEE FIFTY LAWYERS BEFORE SHE COULD FIND ONE WHO WOULD DO WHAT SHE WANTED DONE TO ME. THAT WAS VERY BAD.

HOW MANY PEOPLE WOULD HEAR ABOUT ME, TWO HUNDRED FROM THOSE VISITS TO OFFICES.

WAS THE LAWYER SHE "FOUND" THE WORST OF THE WORST OR HAD SHE TOLD MORE AND MORE  HARROWING TALES OF HER TERRIBLE SUFFERING. PROBABLY IT WAS A WHOLE LOT OF BOTH OF THOSE.

I KNOW MY EX-WIFE WENT FROM STORE TO STORE, HOW MANY PEOPLE HEARD ABOUT ME LIKE THAT?

I SAW THE NOTES MY EX'S LAWYER DOLE HAD ON A YELLOW PAD ABOUT THE INQUIRY BY A LITTLE HELPER FROM RAY'S SPORTS AND A NOTE ABOUT "ASKING" IF THEY HAD ANY BAD STORIES TO TELL ABOUT ME AT SOOKE'S WESTERN FOODS GROCERY.

HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE GOSSIPING ABOUT ME? HOW HIGH WAS THE NUMBER, HOW MANY PEOPLE HEARD BETTY COLLARD OR TRIXIE DASHEVSKY'S LIES ABOUT ME?

I THINK THERE WERE MANY, PROBABLY A THOUSAND PEOPLE, WHO BASED ON THE DEFAMATORY DESCRIPTION OF MYSELF WOULD PUNISH ME IF THEY COULD OR RULE AGAINST ME, REFUSE TO ACT FOR ME OR ON MY BEHALF.